Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise in Babolsar ownship

Authors
Seyed Hassan sadogh
Khabat Derafshi
Abstract
Abstract

Coastal areas are dynamic and complex multi-function systems. A wide number of often conflicting human socio-economic activities occur in these areas. These include urbanization, tourism and recreational activities, industrial production, energy production and delivering, port activities, shipping, and agriculture. Coastal systems are also characterized by important ecological and natural values; their high habitat and biological diversity is fundamental to sustain coastal processes and provide ecosystem services which are essential also for human well-being. Human activities often conflict with the need to preserve natural coastal systems and their ecological processes.

One of the most important applied problems in coastal geology today is determining the physical response of the coastline to sea-level rise. Predicting shoreline retreat and land loss rates is critical to planning future coastal zone management strategies and assessing biological impacts due to habitat changes or destruction. Presently, long-term (>50 years) coastal planning and decision-making has been done piecemeal, if at all, for the nation's shoreline. Consequently, facilities are being located and entire communities are being developed without adequate consideration of the potential costs of protecting or relocating them from sea-level rise-related erosion, flooding and storm damage.

Research on major natural disasters and related technologies has become an important subject in geography and its application. The complexity analysis of the issue is possible in a system approach to theoretical and applied geography also in the integrity of physical and human geography.

Due to the Caspian Sea water-level fluctuation in coastal zone of Babolsar which happens very quickly in decade scale, the observance of safety element will be possible in light of the integrated coastal zone management with determine of sea frontage. In this context, geography and especially geomorphology is a main basic in this kind of coastal management.

Detection of sea level fluctuations causing morphological changes in the earth surface and damage to facilities, clarifies the necessary of the present research to study the role of geomorphological indices in Babolsar coast zone constructions. The Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI) is one of the most commonly used and simple methods to assess coastal vulnerability to sea level rise, in particular due to erosion and/or inundation. The CVI provides a simple numerical basis for ranking sections of coastline in terms of their potential for change that can be used by managers to identify regions where risks may be relatively high. The CVI results can be displayed on maps to highlight regions where the factors that contribute to shoreline changes may have the greatest potential to contribute to changes to shoreline retreat.

In this study, coastal vulnerability index (CVI) is used as effective geomorphic index on Babolsar coast zone constructions. In first, primary and secondary vertical frontages were detect using topographic data (digital elevation model with cell size 10-meter) and Caspian Sea water-level fluctuations.

The primary vertical frontage includes areas which have the lower height of -24.7 meters and secondary vertical frontage consists of areas which are placed between -24.7 and -23.5 meters. Following this issue, within the primary and secondary vertical frontage, coastal vulnerability index was performed based on five parameters, elevation, slope, landform, land use and distance from main road. According to the coastal vulnerability based on natural (NCVI), human (HCVI) and total vulnerability index (TCVI), large parts of the Babolsar coastal zone (especially in Fereidoonkenar and Babolsar city areas) placed in classes of high and very high vulnerability.

With respect to detection of the primary (level -24.7 m) and secondary (from level -24.7 to -23.5 m) frontages in Babolsar township area, 345 and 7177 hectares of the township lands are located in the primary and secondary vertical frontages, respectively. The most area of the township land uses in primary frontage belongs to natural structures that have 153 hectares of area. Survey of lands distribution in the height of -24.7 to -23.5 m (secondary vertical frontage) shows that agriculture land use has the most extent in this area; the area of this land use is 5293 hectares that equivalent to 74 percent of all lands which are located in the secondary frontage. Urban and industrial structures have 45 and 522 hectares of area in the primary and secondary frontages of Caspian Sea in Babolsar Township, respectively.
Keywords
Physical Geography
Coastal Vulnerability Index
Babolsar Coast Area
Aboudha, P.A. and Woodroff, C.D. 2006. International assessment of the vulnerability of the coastal zone to climate change, Including an Australian perspective. Australian greenhouse office. Department of the environment and heritage. School of earth and environmental sciences. University of Wollongong, Australia, pp. 67.
Adger, N.W.; Brooks, N.; Kelly, M.; Bentham, G. and Eriksen, S. 2004. New indicators of vulnerability and adoptive capacity, Tyndall Centre technical (See also http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/research/theme3/final_reports).
Diaconescu, C. and Knapp, J.H. 2001. South Caspian basin: A natural laboratory for sea level change and hydrology stability. Earth system processes - Global meeting (June24-28, 2001).
Escourou, G. 1991. Le climat et laville Nalhan. P. 190.
Firoozfar, A.; Edward, N. and Bromhead, A.P. 2012. Caspian Sea level change impact regional seismicity. Journal of Great lakes research, 38 ( I. 4.): 667-672.
Gornitz, V.M.; Daniels, R.C.; White, T.W. and Birdwell, K.R. 1994. The development of a coastal risk assessment database: Vulnerability to sea-level rise in the U.S. Southwest. Journal of coastal research, Special Issue,12:327-338.
Guigo, M. (1991). Gestion de Environnement et Etude dl Impact. Masson Paris. p. 211.
Haines, P.E. 2005. Determining appropriate setbacks for future development around ICOLLS. 14th NSW Coastal conference, Narooma.
Henderson, A. 1991. Policy Advice on Greenhouse Induced Climatic Change. Progress in Physical Geography, 15: 53-70.
Kakroodi, A.A.; Krooneberg, S.B.; Hoogendoorn, R.M.; Mohaammad khani, H.; Yamani, M. and Ghasemi, R. 2012. Rapid Holocene sea level changes along the Iranian Caspian coast. Journal of Quaternary international, 263: 93-103.
Lahijani, H.; Rahimpour-Bonab, H.; Tavakoli, V. and Hosseindoost, M. 2007. Evidence for late Holocene Highstands in Central Guilan-East Mazanderan, South Caspian coast, Iran. Journal of Quaternary International, 197(1-2): 55-71.
McLaughlin, S., McKenna, J., and Cooper, J.A.G. (2002). Socio-economic data in coastal vulnerability indices: Constraints and opportunities. Journal of coastal research, Special Issue 36: 487-497.
Pacione, M. 1990. Conceptual Issues in Applied Urban Geography. SOC. George. p. 81.
Program International Man and Biosphere. UNESCO, 1970.
Rosenfeld, L. 1994. The Geomorphological Dimension of Natural Disasters. p. 10.
Szlafstein, C.F. 2005. Climate change, sea-level rise and coastal natural hazards: A GIS-based vulnerability assessment, State of Para, Brazil. Human security and climate change an international workshop Asker near Oslo.
Thieler, E.R. and Hammar-klose, E.S. 1999. National assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea level rise: preliminary results for the US Atlantic coast. US Department of the interior, US geology survey.
Vali-khodjeini, A. 1991. Hydrology of the Caspian Sea and its problems. Proceedings of the Vienna symposium, August 1991.
Wicherek, S. 1993. Land Erosion in Temperate Plains and Hills Environment Elsevier. p. 43.