Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Streambank erosion hazard analysis by BEHI method, case study: Sajadroud stream, Mazandaran province

Authors
Reza Esmaili
fatemeh abedini zadeh
University of Mazandaran
10.52547/jsaeh.8.4.27
Abstract
Streambank erosion hazard analysis by BEHI method, case study: Sajadroud stream, Mazandaran province

Extended Abstract

Introduction

River bank erosion is a complex natural process and plays an important role in the dynamic equilibrium of the river. The amount of river bank erosion affects the river plan, cross section and dimensions of the river and is the main factor controlling channel migration and the evolution of the river planform. This research was conducted with two main objectives, which are: 1. River bank erosion susceptibility analysis in incised rivers in mountainous areas, 2. Comparison of river bank erodibility with two methods original BEHI and modified BEHI.

Method

In this study, Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and the modified BEHI method along a part of Sajadrood Stream in Mazandaran province have been investigated. The original BEHI (Rosgen, 1996, 2001) evaluates the river bank erosion field measurements. In this method, several parameters are measured, including bank height, Bankfull height, bank angle, root depth, root density, surface protection, bank material structure and stratification. From this parameters, the bank angle and height, root depth can be measured, but indicators such as plant root density and surface protection are visually estimated as a percentage. The score of each index varies from 1 to 10. The total scores of all indicators are classified into 6 groups: very low, low, medium, high, very high and extreme.

Newton and Drenten (2015) Based on the modified BEHI proposed a protocol for estimating the river bank erosion. In this protocol, the lengths of similar riverbanks are first defined as a uniform section of bank. These uniform sections can be identified due to differences in bank slope, differences in bank material and a break in vegetation. The characteristics of uniform sections are then evaluated in a pre-screening questionnaire consisting of six questions. If the answer to two or more questions is "yes", there is a high probability of erosion and the BEHI evaluation will be performed. Otherwise, the measurement will not be taken because the erosion is low or very low.

Result and discussion

The study area was divided into four reaches and 36 sites were surveyed. These river reaches have a deep bed (incised), high slope, low sinuosity, low width to depth ratio and predominant cobble sediments in the bed. They are in type A3 according to the Rosgen River classification. The height of the banks of the stream is high and its average is 2.6 meters with a minimum and a maximum of 0.4 to 9.7 meters. The average height of bankfull was 0.44 meters and varied from 0.15 to 0.85 meters. Hence, the ratio of bank height to bankfull height has been high. The root depth of plants was low and their average was 0.34 meters. Root density of plants was also low and averaged 5.7% The stream bank angle is measured from 31 to 90 degrees and an average of 51degree. The percentage of surface protection varied between 25 and 65% and averaged 42%. From a total of 36 sites, 8% are in the medium group, 39% in the high erosion category, 45% in the very high erosion group and 8% in the extreme erosion category.

Among the various variables, the β coefficients of the surface protection index and the ratio of bank height to bankfull height were -0.62 and 0.51, respectively. To evaluate the modified BEHI method, all reaches were first examined according to the pre-screening table and more than two "yes" answers were confirmed for each reach. In the modified BEHI method, 26 out of 36 sites were in the erosion group. But in the original BEHI method, 16 sites are in a very high class. The total score of the studied sites was evaluated by two BEHI methods with Pearson correlation coefficients, which obtained a coefficient of 0.21 and shows a relatively low correlation.

Conclusion

Sajadrood stream has high and steep banks due to the incision created in the channel bed. The deposition of large boulders at the toe of the streambank has caused its protection and the flood currents of bankfull are not able to carry this piece of rock. Under these conditions, calculating the ratio of bank height to bankfull height cannot indicate the erodibility of the streambank in the bankfull stage. Nevertheless, the erodible potential of the bank for larger flood currents is confirmed. Comparison of the original BEHI with the modified BEHI showed that the modified method has an overestimate than the original BEHI.



Key word: river bank erosion, BEHI, Sajadroud, Mazandaran
Keywords
River bank Erosion
BEHI
Sajadroud
Mazandaran
- Allmanová, Z.; M. Vlčková, M. Jankovský, M. Jakubis, and M. Allman. 2019. Bank erosion of the Tŕstie stream: BANCS model predictions vs. real bank erosion. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics. 67(2), 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2018-0040
- Bandyopadhyay, S.; S. Saha, K. Ghosh, and S.K. De. 2013. Validation of BEHI Model through field generated data for assessing bank erosion along the River Haora, West Tripura. Earth Sci. India, 6(III): 126-135.
- Bull, L. J. 1997. Magnitude and variation in the contribution of bank erosion to the suspended sediment load of the River Severn, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: the Journal of the British Geomorphological Group, 22(12): 1109-1123.
- Das, N.; and M. Bhowmik. 2013. Qualitative assessment of river bank erosion risk in Jirania rural development block, Tripura. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 3(6): 274-276.
- Florsheim, J. L.; J.F. Mount, and A. Chin. 2008. Bank erosion as a desirable attribute of rivers. BioScience, 58(6): 519-529.
- Fox, G. A.; G.V. Wilson, A. Simon, E.J. Langendoen, O. Akay, and J.W. Fuchs. 2007. Measuring streambank erosion due to ground water seepage: correlation to bank pore water pressure, precipitation and stream stage. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group, 32(10): 1558-1573.
- Ghosh, K. G.; S. Pal, and S. Mukhopadhyay. 2016. Validation of BANCS model for assessing stream bank erosion hazard potential (SBEHP) in Bakreshwar River of Rarh region, Eastern India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(2), 95. DOI:10.1007/s40808-016-0172-0
- Konsoer, K. M.; B.L. Rhoads, E.J. Langendoen, J.L. Best, M.E. Ursic, J.D. Abad, and M.H. Garcia. 2016. Spatial variability in bank resistance to erosion on a large meandering, mixed bedrock-alluvial river. Geomorphology, 252: 80-97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.08.002
- Kwan, H.; and S. Swanson. 2014. Prediction of Annual Streambank Erosion for Sequoia National Forest, California. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 50( 6): 1439‐ 1447, DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12200
- Lan, P. T. H.; L.M. Nguyet, and L. T. V. Hoa. 2019. Assessing the instability of Dong Nai River in Bien Hoa District using Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and Remote Sensing and GIS. In Proceedings of the ICA (Vol. 2, pp. NA-NA). Copernicus GmbH.
- Lawler, D.M. 1993. The measurement of river bank erosion and lateral channel change: A review. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 18: 777-821. DOI :10.1002/esp.3290180905
- Mandal, S. 2017. Assessing the instability and shifting character of the river bank ganga in Manikchak Diara of Malda district, west bengal using bank erosion hazard index (BEHI), RS & GIS. European Journal of Geography, 8(4), 6-25.
- Mazumdar, N.; and B. J. A. Talukdar. 2018. Assessment of River Bank Erosion Potential in Brahmaputra River in Lower Assam Region Using Modified Rosgen’s Bank Erosion Hazard Index Method, IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 8(8): 21-27.
- McMillan, M.; J. Liebens, and C. Metcalf. 2017. Evaluating the BANCS streambank erosion framework on the northern Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 53(6): 1393-1408.
- Newton, S. E.; and D.M. Drenten. 2015. Modifying the bank erosion hazard index (BEHI) protocol for rapid assessment of streambank erosion in northeastern Ohio. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments). 96. e52330.
- Rathbun, J. 2004. Standard operating procedure: Assessing bank erosion potential using Rosgen’s Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI). Water Bureau, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, MI. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/
wb-nps-BEHI-SOP_246873_7.doc.
- Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Fort Collins, Colorado, ISBN-13: 978-0965328906.
- Rosgen, D. L. 2001. A practical method of computing streambank erosion rate. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference.
- Rosgen, D.L., 2006. Watershed Assessment of River Stability and Sediment Supply (WARSSS). Wildland Hydrology, Fort Collins, Colorado, ISBN-13: 978-09791308.
- Sass, C. K.; T.D. Keane. 2012. Application of Rosgen’s BANCS Model for NE Kansas and the Development of Predictive Streambank Erosion Curves1. 48(4): 774-787. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012. 00644.x
- Simon, A.; J. Castro, and M. Rinaldi. 2016. Channel form and adjustment: characterization, measurement, interpretation and analysis. Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 235-259.
- Simpson, A., I. Turner, E. Brantley, and B. Helms. 2014. Bank erosion hazard index as an indicator of near-bank aquatic habitat and community structure in a southeastern Piedmont stream, Ecological Indicators. 43: 19-28.
Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards
Volume 8, Issue 4
Winter 2021
Pages 27-40