Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Change Detection Gamasiab River Margins in Kermanshah by Comparison Pixel Base and Object Orientd Algorithms

Authors
Sayyad Asghare Saraskanrod
Roholah Jalilian
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
10.52547/jsaeh.8.4.157
Abstract


Introduction

Land use reflects the interactive characteristics of humans and the environment and describes how human exploitation works for one or more targets on the ground. Land use is usually defined on the basis of human use of the land, with an emphasis on the functional role of land in economic activities. Land use, which is associated with human activity, is undergoing change over time. Land use information and land cover are important for activities such as mapping and land management. Over time, land cover patterns and, consequently, land use change, and the human factor can play a major role in this process. Today, satellite-based measurements with geographic information systems are increasingly being used to identify and analyze land-use change and land cover. With regard to the problems of changes and transformations in the studied area, remote sensing can allow managers to categorize images and evaluate land use changes, in addition to saving time and costs, which allows planners to make plans based on changes, more resources are lost. To be prevented.



Materials & Methods

In order to classify and detect the marginal land of the river, TM and OLI image images were selected for a specific month (August, August) for the years 1987 and 2017. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes occurring in the studied area with an emphasis on agricultural lands. To do this, the images before processing in the ENVI software took radiometric, atmospheric and geometric corrections on them. After that, the main components of the river route were extracted. Five basic algorithms were used to classify the base pixel, but eCognition software was used to classify the object. Supervised classification identifies homogeneous regions with examples of land use and land cover, in which pixels are assigned in known information classes. Education is a process that determines the criteria for these patterns. Learning output is a set of spectral signatures of proposed classes. The first step in object-oriented classification is the segmentation of the image and the creation of distinct objects, consisting of homogeneous pixels. The main purpose of image segmentation is to combine pixels or small objects to create large image objects based on the spectral and spatial characteristics of the image. In order to evaluate the accuracy and compare the resulting maps, the overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient are used. When the sampling of pixels is done as a spectral or informational class pattern, the evaluation of the spectral reflection of classes and their resolution can also be done. An algorithm with the highest accuracy and accuracy will be the basis for the detection. Detection of changes, which leads to a two-way matrix and shows variations of the main types of land use in the study area, was carried out in this study. Pixel-based cross-tabulation analysis on pixels facilitates the determination of the conversion value from a specific user class to another user category and areas associated with these changes over the given time period.



Results & Discussion

The results showed that the object-oriented method is more accurate than the base pixel algorithms for providing user-defined maps. The amount of accuracy in the method based on object-oriented classification depends largely on choosing the appropriate parameters for classification, defining the rules, and applying the appropriate algorithm to obtain the degree of membership. The Kappa coefficient for each image is approximately 0.90. So these maps are the basis for the discovery of change. According to the results, the agricultural and residential lands have been increased and this increase has been accompanied by a decrease in rangelands. A general overview of this 30-year period shows that the arable and dry farming, respectively, increased by 2418.79 and 719.61 hectares and the rangelands had a decrease of 2848.86 hectares. However, the residential class and human effects show an increase of 428.88 hectares or a growth of 178.87%, which indicates the importance of agriculture in the studied area.



Conclusion

Identifying and discovering land cover changes can help planners and planners identify effective factors in land use change and land cover, and have a useful planning to control them. For this reason, maps are needed with precision and speed, and object-oriented processing methods make this possible with very high precision. The results of this study, in addition to proving the precision and efficiency of object-oriented processing in land cover estimation, between 1987 and 2017, have witnessed a decrease in the area of rangeland lands and, on the other hand, agricultural and residential lands, which is indicative of the overall trend Destruction in the area through the replacement of pastures by other uses such as rainfed farming.



Keywords: Land Use, Gamasiab, Object Oriented, Pixel Base, Kappa Coefficient
Keywords
Land use
Gamasiab
Object oriented
Pixel Base
kappa coefficient
اکبری، الهه؛ محمد علی زنگنه اسدی و ابراهیم تقوی مقدم. 1395. پایش تغییرات کاربری اراضی با استفاده از روش‌های مختلف تئوری آموزش آماری منطقه نیشابور. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 20: 35-50.
جباری، ایرج؛ نوشین پیروزی‌نژاد و محمد حسین رضایی مقدم. 1394. بررسی تغییرات الگوی رودخانه گاماسیاب در رابطه با تغییرات پشته‌های ماسه‌ای. جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، دوره بیست و ششم، 2: 299-320.
راهداری، وحید؛ سعیده ملکی؛ میثم راهداری؛ سعید محمودی؛ نیره پورملایی؛ محمد رضا علیمرادی؛ الهام آبتین؛ مهدی کدخدایی و سعید پورمنافی. تجارب و پیامد‌های انتقال آب بین حوضه‌ای در جهان بررسی قابلیت داده‌های ماهواره‌ای چند طیفی در تهیه نقشه عمق آب و اراضی مجاور ذخیره‌گاههای آبی (مطالعه موردی: ذخیره‌گاههای آبی چاه نیمه‌های سیستان). تحقیقات منابع آب ایران، 37: 130-141.
علوی‌پناه، سید کاظم. 1384. کاربرد سنجش از دور در علوم زمین، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
علوی‌پناه، سید کاظم. 1390. اصول سنجش از دور نوین و تفسیر تصاویر ماهواره‌ای و عکس‌های هوایی، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
فاطمی، سید باقر و یوسف رضایی. 1391. مبانی سنجش از دور، انتشارات آزاده، تهران.
مکرونی، سرور؛ غلامرضا سبز قبایی؛ شهرام یوسفی خانقاه و ستار سلطانیان. 1395. آشکارسازی روند تغییرات کاربری اراضی تالاب هورالعظیم با استفاده از تکنیک سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی. سنجش از دور و سامانه اطلاعات جغرافیایی در منابع طبیعی، 24: 89-99.
Al Rawashdeh, S.B. 2012. Assessment of Change Detection Method Based on Normalized Vegetation Index in Environmental Studies. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 10(2): 89- 97.
Al-Ahmadi, F.S., Hames, A.S. 2009. Comparison of four classification methods to extract land use and land cover from raw satellite images for some remote arid areas, kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Earth, 20(1): 167-191.
Al-SALT, J. 2012. Assessment of change detection method based on normalized vegetation index in environmental studies. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 10(2): 89-97.
Benz, U. C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., & Heynen, M. (2004). Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 58(3-4): 239-258.
Boakye, E., Odai, S.N., Adjei, K.A., Annor, F.O. 2008. Landsat images for assessment of the impact of land use and land cover changes on the Barekese catchment in Ghana. European Journal of Scientific Research, 22(2): 269-278.
Borrelli, P., Modugno, S., Panagos, P., Marchetti, M., Schütt, B., Montanarella, L. 2014. Detection of harvested forest areas in Italy using Landsat imagery. Applied Geography, 48: 102-111.
Chander, G., Markham, B.L., Helder, D.L. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote sensing of environment, 113(5): 893-903.
Chen, M., Su, W., Li, L., Zhang, C., Yue, A., Li, H. 2009, Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented knowledge-based classification methods using SPOT5 imagery. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 3(6): 477-489.
Coppin, P., I. Jonckheere, K. nackaerts, B. Muys. 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9): 1565–1596.
Gao, Y., Mas, J.F., Kerle, N., Navarrete Pacheco, J.A. 2011. Optimal region growing segmentation and its effect on classification accuracy. International journal of remote sensing, 32(13): 3747-3763.
Green, E., Mumby, P., Edwards, A., Clark, C. 2000. Remote Sensing: Handbook for Tropical Coastal Management. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Hathout, S. 2002. The use of GIS for monitoring and predicting urban growth in East and West St Paul, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Environmental management, 66(3): 229-238.
Houghton, R. A., Hackler, J.L., Lawrence, K.T. 1999. The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science, 285(5427): 574-578.
Howarth, P.J., Wickware, G.M. 1981. Procedures for change detection using Landsat digital data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2(3): 277-291.
Jensen, J.R. 2015. Digital Image Processing, 4th Edition, University of South Carolina.
Kloor, K. 1999. A Surprising Tale of Life in the City. Science, 286: 663-663.
Lambin, E.F., Strahlers, A.H. 1994. Change-vector analysis in multitemporal space: a tool to detect and categorize land-cover change processes using high temporal-resolution satellite data. Remote sensing of environment, 48(2): 231-244.
Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., Chipman, J. 2014. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.
Madurapperuma, B., Rozario, P., Oduor, P., Kotchman, L. 2015. Land-use and land-cover change detection in Pipestem Creek watershed, North Dakota. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 5(3): 416.
Mather, P.M., Tso, B. 2009. Classification methods for remotely sensed data, second edition, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, CRC Press, New York.
Milne, A.K. 1988. Change direction analysis using Landsat imagery: a review of methodology. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1988. IGARSS'88, Remote Sensing: Moving Toward the 21st Century., International 1: 541-544.
Nasimi, A., Ohadi, M. 2005. Department of foundation and law investigation. expertly view to conservation of orchards and agricultural lands bill. (In Persion)
Prakash, A., Gupta, R.P. 1998. Land-use mapping and change detection in a coal mining area-a case study in the Jharia coalfield, India. International journal of remote sensing, 19(3): 391-410.
Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., ... & Leemans, R. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100, science, 287(5459): 1770-1774.
Singh, A. 1989. Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International journal of remote sensing, 10(6): 989-1003.
Yanli, Y., Jabbar, M.T., Zhou, J.X. 2012. Study of environmental change detection using Remote Sensing and GIS application: A case study of northern Shaanxi Province, China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud, 21(3):789-790.
Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards
Volume 8, Issue 4
Winter 2021
Pages 157-178