Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Vulnerability assessment of karst aquifer using COP and PI model (Case study: Bisotun and Paraw aquifers)

Authors
Fateme Emadoddin
Amir Safari
Kharazmi University
Abstract
Vulnerability assessment of karst aquifer using COP and PI model (Case study: Bisotun and Paraw aquifers)





Introduction

Drinking karst water resources, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, like Iran, are considered as valuable and strategic water resources. A sharp decrease in rainfall reduces the quality and quantity of karst water sources (Christensen et al., 2007). On the other hand, urban and industrial development, which is accompanied by the increase in population growth, increases the risk of underground water pollution caused by the dumping of chemicals, waste and change of use (McDonald et al., 2011). Protection of karst aquifer is one of the most important measures in the management of karst water resources due to its vulnerability and high sensitivity to pollution (Khoshakhlagh et al., 2014, Afrasiabian, 2007). Therefore, With the advancement of geographic information system technology, rapid progress was made in the ability to identify and model groundwater pollution, as well as the vulnerability of water sources from these pollutants (Babiker et al., 2004, Rahman, 2008). The pollution potential decreases from the center to the periphery (Saffari et al., 2021).



Materials and methods

In this study to evaluate the vulnerability of Bisotun and Paraw aquifer which is karstically developed and has, crack and fissure and various landforms; COP and PI vulnerability models have been used to identify areas at risk of contamination. The COP model includes three main factors including concentration of flow (C), overlaying layers (O) and precipitation (P). Factor C, which indicates surface features (Sf), slope and vegetation (Sv). It was obtained between 0.8-0.0 in 5 classes. From the overlap of the subfactores soil, layer index and lithology, the O factor map was prepared in three classes, including class 2 with low protection value, 2-4 with medium protection value and 4-8 with high protection value. The P factor, which is the temporal distribution of precipitation along with the intensity and duration of precipitation, can show the ability of precipitation to transfer pollutants from the surface to the underground water. P factor was 0.8 in 2 layers in the northwest of the study area and 0.8-0.9 with low protection value. Furthermore, top Soil, precipitation, net recharge, fracture density, bedrock and lithology maps were used for the protective cover factor (P) in the PI model. The zoning of the P factor showed 2 classes such as very low and low most of the study area is in the low class. The infiltration condition factor (I) using the characteristics of the soil, the slope layer, and the land use in four layers showed high, aamedium, low, very low, which due to the high slope of the area of ​​the high layer has the highest dispersion, which causes the reduction of the protective cover.



Results and discussion

Consequently, COP vulnerability map in 5 classes with very high vulnerability (0-0.5) equal to 38774.74 hectares (41.4%) and very low vulnerability (4-9-4) with 57.86 hectares (0.06%) of the largest and smallest area respectively. Also, the PI vulnerability map of the combination of these two factors showed very high vulnerability with the largest area of ​​about 68,783 hectares and 72.9% scattered throughout the study area and the high vulnerability class with an area of ​​about 25,526 hectares and 27%.



Conclusion

The results of this research showed that the simulation performance of each COP and PI vulnerability model is closely related to the amount of pollution in the environment. It seems that the COP vulnerability model can better and more accurately showed the level of vulnerability in the karst aquifers of Bisotun and Paraw.







Keywords: karst aquifer, Bisotun and Paraw, COP model, PI model, vulnerability.




Keywords
karst aquifer
Bisotun and Paraw
COP model
PI model
Vulnerability
Afrasiabian, A. 2007. The importance of protection and management of Karst water as drinking water resources in Iran. Environmental drinking, 4: 673-677.
Andreo, B.; and F. Carrasco. 2008. Methodology for groundwater recharge assessment in carbonate aquifers: application to pilot sites in southern Spain. Hydrogeology Journal, 5: 911-925.
Babiker, I S.; Mohamed A, Terao. H, Kato. K, and Ohta. K. 2004. Assessment of groundwater contamination by nitrate leaching from intensive vegetable cultivation using geographical information system. Environment International, 8:1009-1017. Doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)000953.
Bakalowicz, M. 2005. Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. Hydrogeology. https://Doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0402-9.
BGR.; IAH, KIT, and UNESCO. 2017. World Karst Aquifer Map, 1:40 000 000. Berlin, Reading, Karlsruhe and Paris.
Christensen, Jens Hesselbjerg.; Bruce. Hewitson, and Aristita. Busuioc. 2007. Regional climate projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., and New York, 849,926.
Daly, D.; Alain. Dassargues, David. Drew, S. Dunne, Nico. Goldscheider, S. Neale, IIeana Cristina. Popescu, and Francois. Zwahlen. 2002. Main concepts of the “European approach” to karst-groundwater vulnerability assessment and mapping. Hydrogeology, 2: 340-345. https://Doi.org/10.1007/ s10040-001-0185-1.
De Jong, C.; S. Cappy, M. Finckh, and D. Funk. 2008. A transdisciplinary analysis of water problems in the mountainous karst areas of Morocco. Engineering Geology, 3: 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.11.021
Dimitriou, Elias.; Ioannis. Karaouzas, Konstantinos. Sarantakos, Ierotheos. Zacharias, Konstantinos. Bogdanos, and Aristidis. Diapoulis. 2008. Groundwater risk assessment at a heavily industrialised catchment and the associated impacts on a peri-urban wetland. Environmental Management, 3: 526-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.019
Dixon, B. 2005. Groundwater vulnerability mapping: a GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool. Applied Geography, 4: 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.07.002
Ducci, Daniela. 2008. Contamination risk of the Alburni Karst System (southern Italy). Geological Society, 1: 137-151.
Ford, Derek.; and Paul. Williams. 2007. Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology. Second edition, Wiley, Chichester, the United States, DOI:10.1002/9781118684986
Goldscheider, N.; M. Klute, S. Sturm, and H. Hotzl. 2000. The PI Method - a GIS-Based Approach to Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability with Special Consideration of Karst Aquifers. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Geologie, 46: 157-166.
Goldscheider. Nico. 2005. Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: Application of a new method in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Hydrogeology, 4: 555-564. DOI:10.1007/s10040-003-0291-3
Holting, B.; T. Haertle, K.H. Hohberger, H. Ecki, J. Hahn, and C. Koldehoff. 1995. Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktion der rundwasser_berdeckung [Concept for the evaluation of the protective function of the layers overlying groundwater]. Geologisches Jahrbuch, 63: 5-24.
Kavouri, Konstantina.; Valerie. Plagnes, Joel. Tremoulet, Nathelie. Dörfliger, Faycal. Reijiba,; and Pierre. Marchet. 2011. PaPRIKA: a method for estimating karst resource and source vulnerability—application to the Ouysse karst system (southwest France). Hydrogeology. 19: 339–353. Doi.10.1007/s10040-010-0688-8
Kendall, Carol.; and Ramon. Aravena. 2000. Nitrate isotopes in groundwater systems. Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology. Springer, Boston, MA https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4557-6_9.
Kirso, M.; and Y.Zhou. 2006. GIS-based vulnerability assessment and mapping for the protection of the Dire Dawa groundwater basin. Ethiopia, 34th Congress of international association of hydro geologists, Beijing, P.R. China. Oct 9-13.
Manga, M. 1999. On the timescales characterizing groundwater discharge at springs. Hydrology, 1-2: 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00044-X
Mangin, A. 1975. Contribution à l'étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques. University of Dijon, France (PhD Thesis).
McDonald, R. I.; I. Douglas, C. Revenga, R. Hale, N. Grimm, and J.Gronwall. 2011. Global urban growth and the geography of water availability, quality, and delivery. AMBIO, 5: 437-446. Doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0152-6.
Mudarra, M.; and B.Andreo. 2011. Relative importance of the saturated and the unsaturated zones in the hydrogeological functioning of karst aquifers: The case of Alta Cadena (Southern Spain). Hydrology, 3: 63-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.005
Nestler, Angelika.; Michael. Berglund, Frederik. Accoe, Steluta. Duta, Dongmi. Xue, P. Boeckx, and P. Taylor. 2011. Isotopes for improved management of nitrate pollution in aqueous resources: review of surface water field studies. Environment Science, 18: 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0422-z.
Padilla, I.Y.; and D.J. Vesper. 2018. Fate, transport, and exposure of emerging and legacy contaminants in karst systems: state of knowledge and uncertainty. Karst Science, 33–49 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51070-5_5.
Plan, L.; K. Decker, R. Faber, M. Wagreich, and B.Grasemann. 2009. Karst morphology and groundwater vulnerability of high alpine karst plateaus. Environmental Geology, 2: 285-297.
Rahman, A. 2008. A GIS based Drastic model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Applied Geography, 1: 32-53.
Rama, Fabrizio.; Busico. Gianluigi, Arumi. José Luis, Kazakis. Nerantzis, Colombani. Nicolò, Luigi. Marfella, Ricardo. Hirata, Eduardo. E. Kruse, Paul. Sweeney, and Micòl. Mastrocicco. 2022. Assessment of intrinsic aquifer vulnerability at continental scale through a critical application of the drastic framework: The case of South America, Science of The Total Environment, Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153748.
Ravbar, N.; and N. Goldscheider 2009. Comparative application of four methods of groundwater vulnerability mapping in a Slovene karst catchment. Hydrogeology, 17: 725-733.
Reberski, Jasmina Luka.; Josip. Terzi´c; Louise. D.Maurice, and Dan. J.Lapworth. 2021. Emerging organic contaminants in karst groundwater: A global level assessment. Hydrology, 1-3: 127-242. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169421012920
Rundquist, D. C.; A. J. Peters, L. Di, D. A. Rodekohr, R. L. Ehrman, and G. Murray. 1991. Statewide groundwater-vulnerability assessment in Nebraska using the drastic/GIS model. Geocarto International, 2: 51-58.
Van Brahana, J. 2008. Karst aquifers. Encyclopedia of water science (2ndEd).http://www.informaworld.com/10.1081/E-EWS2-120010039.
Van Burkalow, A. 1959. The Geography of New York City’s water supply: a study of interactions. Geography Review, 3: 369-386.
Vías, J.M.; B. Andreo, M.J. Perles, F.Carrasco, I. Vadillo, and P. Jiménez. 2006. Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method. Hydrogeology, 6:912-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-006-0023-6.
White, W.B. 2002. Karst hydrology: recent developments and open questions. Engineering Geology. 65: 85–105.
Yang, Pingheng.; Ying. Li, Chris. Groves, and Aihua. Hong. 2019. Coupled hydro geochemical evaluation of a vulnerable karst aquifer impacted by septic effluent in a protected natural area. Science of the Total Environment, 658: 1475–1484
Zwahlen, F. 2004. Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers. Final report (COST action 620), European Commission, Directorate-General XII Science. Res. Dev. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7.