Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Analyzing of Threat network and hazard ring in earthquake risk with passive defense approach(Case study: Kermanshah metropolis)

Authors
kiomars maleki 1
mostafa taleshi 2
mohammad raoof heidari Far 3
1 municipality
2 university of payame noor
3 full professor
Abstract
The results of pathological evaluation of seismic zones in the terrestrial space indicate a significant concentration of residential spaces, especially cities. It has been economic and human. Therefore, one of the desirable models in identifying, analyzing and reducing damage in urban spaces is to use the structural and functional framework of passive defense. In many recent studies, the subject of reducing earthquake damage in the territory of the physical-spatial field has been to increase the building's resistance to earthquakes. While this study by recognizing environmental components, physical-spatial, social, economic and effective indicators in each component (45 indicators) to determine the pathology and risk areas of earthquakes in a comprehensive and desirable and based on that reduction strategies Redefines risk. In other words, by recognizing and analyzing the basic concept of threat network and risk ring with passive defense approach in earthquake assessment and vulnerability in Kermanshah metropolis to form the required database structure in appropriate software environment, appropriate policy and urban crisis management measures It is designed in proportion to the earthquake risk.
Keywords
passive defense
Threat Network and Risk Ring
Vulnerability
Earthquake
Kermanshah Metropolis
Alexander, D., (2002); principles of emergency and management’s, Oxford University Press.
• Ebert, A., Karle, N., Stein, A (2008), Urban Social Vulnerability Assessment, urban social vulnerability assessment using object– oriented analysis of remot sensing and GIS data, A case study for tegucigalpa, Honduras, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, vol.wwwvll, part B7, Beijing, pp:1307-1311.
• Cutter. S. L, Ash. K. D, and Christopher T. Emrich. (2020). Urban–Rural Differences in Disaster Resilience, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol.106, No. 6, pp.1236- 1252.
• Chanliang, X., lin, Ch. , wei, S., Wei., W. (2011). vulnerability of large city and Its Implication in urban planning:A perspective of Intra- urban structure – China-Geograghy science.21(2).
• Church, Richard L., T. Murray, Alan (2009), Business site selection, location analysis and GIS, Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada
• Elshehabi, O. (2015). Rootless Hubs: Migration, Urban Commodification and ‘the Right to the City’in the GCC. Transit States: Labour, Migration & Citizenship in the Gulf, London, Pluto Books, 101-131
• Gunderson, L.H. (2010). Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecology and Society. 15(2): 323-331.
• Khatsü, Petevilie (2005), Urban Multi-Hazard Risk Analysis Using GIS and Remote Sensing: A Case Study of a Part of Kohima Town, India, ITC & IIRS Institutes: P. 101-121.
• Nieves Lantada ÆLuis G. PujadesÆAlex H. Barbat 2010, Vulnerability Index and Capacity Spectrum, Based Method for Urban Seismic Risk, Evaluation Journal of Nathazards, Doi 10-007 11069 007-9212-4.
• Linares R., Alejandra. R (2012), Panama Prepares the City of david for Earthquakes, project highlights issue 9, panama, pp:1
• Moehle. J., Barkley. C., Bonowitz, D., Karlinsky, S., Maffei, J., Poland, C (2009)‚ the Resilient City-A Way of Thinking about Preparedness, Mitigation, and Rebuilding, Proceeding of the NZSEE conference‚ Apr 3-5, ChristchurchMurgante, Beniamino & others (2009). Geocomputation and Urban Planning, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
• Paton, Douglas and Johnson, David, 2001, Disasters and Communities: Vulnerability, Resilience and Preparedness, Disaster Prevention and management, Vol. 10, No.4, MCB university press.
• Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities. London: Earth scan.
• Rashed. T,Weeks. J,Couclelis. H,Herold. M, (2017), an integrative GIS and remote sensing model for place-based urban vulnerability analysis.
• Rashed T., Weeks, J (2003), Assessing Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazards through Spatial Multicriteria Analysis of Urban areas, Geographica information science, vol.1, No.6, pp:547-567.
• Sue, T., Simon, M., Hazel, F., & Meghan, A. (2010). Social vulnerability to natural hazards, Flood Hazard Research Centre (FHRC), Middlesex University.
• 61. UN/ISDR, 2005- Word Conference on Disaster Reduction. 18- 22 January, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
• Wald, D.J., Jaiswal, K.S., ASCE, A.M.K., Marano, D., Bausch, D (2011), Earthquake Impact Scale, Natural Hazards Review, www .ascelibrary.org, pp:125-139.