Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Synoptic-dynamic analysis of dust storm and its simulation in southwest of Iran in summer 2005

Authors
nasim hossien hamzeh
ebrahim fattahi
Mjtaba Zoljodi
Parvin Ghaforian
abbas ranjbar
10.18869/acadpub.jsaeh.3.1.91
Abstract
Dust particles consist of important aerosols and resulting in blowing strong winds on the surface of desert areas. These particles enter the atmosphere under the influence of different factors including: weather condition (wind, precipitation and temperature), land surface (topography, humidity level, roughness and vegetation), soil features (texture, density, composition and land use (agriculture).

Today powerful dust storm destroys people lives and causes severe damages to their life and also causes financial problems in most regions of the world especially in west and southwest of Asia. Dust storm is one of the most important natural phenomena and also a kind of severe natural disaster that influence Iran and its west and southwest part. The location of Iran on the desert belt is accompanied by frequent increasing of sand and dust storm. Integral prediction of dust storm phenomena can be useful in decreasing damages caused by these storms. So synoptic-dynamic analysis of dust storms and their simulation play an important role in achieving to this goal.

In this research, we investigate severe dust storm in August 2005 that affected a large area of our country. Select of dusty days were based on minimum visibility and maximum durability of that dust storm. At first, we show the minimum of daily visibility table. These data has been provided by Meteorological Organization in 5 western cities. The synoptic maps were related to these phenomena derived from NOAA website and synoptic and dynamic interpretation has been done. We have got the data with resolution of 2.5 degree from NOAA website.

Then 700 hpa relative vorticity maps were drawn. We investigate MODIS images instrument on Aqua satellite and evaluate the amount of mass concentration of dust particles. Then the Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model has been used to determine the backward trajectory of dust particles. We run HYSPLIT model by GDAS data with a resolution of 0.5 degrees. At last we investigate the output of the WRE-CHEM model. This model was run to simulate dust storms in 7-10 August and FNL data with a resolution 1 degree use for initial and boundary conditions. WRF-CHEM is used to simulate dust condition and transmission. As a part of WRF model, its main application is the study of atmosphere chemistry.

At 500 hpa a very strong ridge entered Iran from the southwest. It covered all areas of our country which prevents the transference of dust to high levels of atmosphere. In 700 hpa relative vorticity maps show one day before dust storm reach to Iran a Positive voriticity is located in Iraq and Syria. So dust comes up to higher levels of the atmosphere and in dusty days in our country. There is a negative voriticity located in our country and because of downside movement of the air, dust storm happen in Iran.

Dust loading and friction velocity of outputs of the model has been drawn in dusty days. The time series of dust concentration of output models for Tabriz are compared with the concentration data of Environmental Organization of visibility data. Result show that a low pressure system is located over the Oman sea that its blaze has been extended to the northwest of Iran. On the other hand a high pressure center is located in the Europe that extended to the east of Mediterranean. So strong pressure gradient were in Iraq and Syria and they caused the creation of strong winds in their deserts which caused dust emission.

Friction velocity related to the model outputs show that the velocity of wind is high in dusty days in Iraq and Syria. So conditions are suitable for dust raining. Satellite images showed that WRF/CHEM model is simulated very well in emission, source, diffusion and the extent of the areas covered with dust. Comparing MP10 concentration of the model output with and Environment Organization data of Tabriz city show that WRF/CHEM model forecast daily changes well. But model underestimate significantly in quantity of concentration. This error may be due to a model considering only dust quantity but other pollutants affected on visibility. In general it can be said that in this event, dust concentration has been underestimated by WRF/CHEM model especially in maximum amount of PM10 concentration.
Keywords
Dust storms
WRF-CHEM model
Satellite images
dust concentration
visibility
Ferreira, J.; Rodriguez, A.; Monteiro, A.; Miranda, A.; Dios, M.; Souto, J.A.; Yarwood, G.; Nopmongcol, U. and Borrego, C. 2012. Air quality simulations for North America - MM5-CAMx modelling performance for main gaseous pollutants. Atmospheric Environment, 53: 212-224
Balkanski, Y. J.; Jacob, D. J.; Gardner, G. M.; Graustain, W. C. and Turekian, K. K. 1993. Transport and residence times of tropospheric aerosols inferred from a global three-dimensional simulation of 210Pb, J. Geophys. Res. 98(D11), 20573-20586.
Cavazos Guerra, C. D. C.; 2011, Modelling the atmospheric controls and climate impact of mineral dust in The Sahara Desert . PhD Thesis. University College London.
Chin, M.; Ginoux, P.; Lucchesi, R.; Huebert, B.; Weber, R.; Anderson, T. and Thornton, D. 2003, A global aerosol model forecast for the ACE‐Asia field experiment. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres,108(D23).
Colarco, P.; da Silva, A.; Chin, M. and Diehl, T. 2009, Online simulations of global aerosol distributions in the NASA GEOS-4 model and comparisons to satellite and ground-based aerosol optical depth. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D14207, doi:10.1029/2009JD012820.
Fast, J. D.; Gustafson, W. I.; Easter, R. C.; Zaveri, R. A.; Barnard, J. C.; Chapman, E. G. and Peckham, S. E. 2006. Evolution of ozone, particulates, and aerosol direct radiative forcing in the vicinity of Houston using a fully coupled meteorology‐chemistry‐aerosol model. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres , 111(D21).
Ginoux, P.; Chin, M.; Tegen, I.; Prospero, J. M.; Holben, B.; Dubovik, O. and Lin, S. J. 2001. Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres ,106(D17), 20255-20273.
Ginoux, P.; Prospero, J. M.; Torres, O. and Chin, M. 2004, Long-term simulation of global dust distribution with the GOCART model correlation with North Atlantic Oscillation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(2), 113-128.
Ginoux, P.; Prospero, J. M.; Gill, T. E.; Hsu, N. C. and Zhao, M. 2012. Global‐scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products. Reviews of Geophysics,50(3).
Grell, G. A.; Peckham, S. E.; Schmitz, R.; Mc Keen, S. A.; Frost, G.; Skamarock, W. C. and Eder, B. 2005. Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model. Atmospheric Environment, 39(37), 6957-6975.
Nickovic, S.; Kallos, G.; Papadopoulos, A. and Kakaliagou, O. 2001. A model for prediction of desert dust cycle in the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D16), 18113-18129.
Rezazadeh, M.; Irannejad, P. and Shao, Y., 2013, Climatology of the Middle East dust events. Aeolian Research, 10, 103-109.
Shao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Song, Z.; Leslie, L. M.; Dong, C. and Chun, Y. 2003. Northeast Asian dust storms: Real‐time numerical prediction and validation. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres ,108(D22).
Tegen, I. 2003. Modeling the mineral dust aerosol cycle in the climate system.Quaternary Science Reviews, 22(18), 1821-1834
Wesely, M. L. 1989. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmospheric Environment , 23(6), 1293-1304.
Woodward, S. 2001. Modeling the atmospheric life cycle and radiative impact of mineral dust in the Hadley Centre climate model, J. Geophys. Res., 106, D16.
Zakey, S.; Solmon, F. and Giorgi, F. 2006. Implementation and testing of a desert dust module in a regional climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4687-4704.
Choobari, O.A.; Zawar-Reza, P. and Sturman, A. 2012. Feedback between windblown dust and planetary boundary-layer characteristics: sensitivity to boundary and surface layer parameterizations. Atmospheric Environment,61, pp.294-304.
Choobari, O.A. ; Zawar-Reza, P. and Sturman, A., 2014. The global distribution of mineral dust and its impacts on the climate system: A review.Atmospheric Research, 138, pp.152-165.
Choobari, O.A.; Zawar-Reza, P. and Sturman, A., 2013. Simulation of the spatial distribution of mineral dust and its direct radiative forcing over Australia. Tellus B, 65.
Alizadeh Choobari, O.; Zawar‐Reza, P. and Sturman, A. 2012. Atmospheric forcing of the three‐dimensional distribution of dust particles over Australia: A case study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012),117(D11).
Shao, Y. 2001. A model for mineral dust emission. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 106(D17), pp.20239-20254.
Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 9
Spring 2016
Pages 91-102