Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards

Detection of extreme precipitation changes and attribution to climate change using standard optimal fingerprinting (Case study: The Southwest of Iran)

Authors
Tofigh Saadi
Bohloul Alijani
Ali Reza Massah Bavani
Mehry Akbary
10.18869/acadpub.jsaeh.3.3.65
Abstract
Understanding the changes in extreme precipitation over a region is very important for adaptation strategies to climate change. One of the most important topics in this field is detection and attribution of climate change. Over the past two decades, there has been an increasing interest for scientists, engineers and policy makers to study about the effects of external forcing to the climatic variables and associated natural resources and human systems and whether such effects have surpassed the influence of the climate’s natural internal variability. The definitions used in the 5th assessment report were taken from the IPCC guidance paper on detection and attribution, and were stated as follows: “Detection of change is defined as the process of demonstrating that climate or a system affected by climate has changed in some defined statistical sense without providing a reason for that change. An identified change is detected in observations if its likelihood of occurrence by chance due to internal variability alone is determined to be small. Attribution is defined as the process of evaluating the relative contributions of multiple causal factors to a change or event with an assignment of statistical confidence”. Detection and attribution of human-induced climate change provide a formal tool to decipher the complex causes of climate change. In this study the optimal fingerprinting detection and attribution have been attempted to investigate the changes in the annual maximum of daily precipitation and the annual maximum of 5-day consecutive precipitation amount over the southwest of Iran.

This is achieved through the use of the Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Water Resources Project(APHRODITE) dataset as observation, a climate model runs and the standard optimal fingerprint method. To evaluate the response of climate to external forcing and to estimate the internal variability of the climate system from pre-industrial runs, the Norwegian Climate Center’s Earth System Model- NorESM1-M was used. We used up scaling to remap both grid data of observations and simulations to a large pixel. This remapped pixel coverages the area of the southwest of Iran. The optimal finger printing method needs standardized values like probability index(PI) or anomalies as input data, since the magnitude of precipitation varied highly from one region to another. The General Extreme Value distribution (GEV) is used to convert time series of the Rx1day and Rx5day into corresponding time series of PI. Then we calculated non-overlapping 5-year mean PI time series over the area study. In this research, we applied optimal fingerprinting method by using empirical orthogonal functions. The implementation of optimal fingerprinting often involves projecting onto k leading EOFs in order to decrease the dimension of the data and improve the estimate of internal climate variability. A residual consistency test used to check if the estimated residuals in regression algorithm are consistent with the assumed internal climate variability. Indeed, as the covariance matrix of internal variability is assumed to be known in these statistical models, it is important to check whether the inferred residuals are consistent with it; such that they are a typical realization of such variability. If this test is passed, the overall statistical model can be considered suitable.

Results obtained for response to anthropogenic and natural forcing combined forcing (ALL) for Rx1day and Rx5day show that scaling factors are significantly greater than zero and consistent with unit. These results indicate that the simulated ALL response is consistent with Rx1day observed changes. Also, it is found that the changes in observed extreme precipitation during 1951-2005 lie outside the range that is expected from natural internal variability of climate alone and greenhouse gasses alone, based on NorESM1-M climate model. Such changes are consistent with those expected from anthropogenic forcing alone. The detection results are sensitive to EOFs. We estimate the anthropogenic and natural forcing combined attributable change in PI over 1951–2005 to be 1.64% [0.18%, 3.1%, >90% confidence interval] for RX1day and 2.5% [1%,4%] for RX5day.
Keywords
Detection
attribution
Standard Optimal fingerprinting
Extreme precipitation
the southwest of Iran
Alexander, L. V., X. Zhang, T. C. Peterson, J. Caesar, B. Gleason, A. M. G. Klein Tank, M. Haylock, D. Collins, B. Trewin, F. Rahimzadeh, A. Tagipour, K. Rupa Kumar, J. Revadekar, G. Griffiths, L. Vincent, D. B. Stephenson, J. Burn, E. Aguilar, M. Brunet, M. Taylor, M. New, P. Zhai, M. Rusticucci and J. L. Vazquez-Aguirre. 2006. Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. Journal Of Geophysical Research,111:1-22, DOI:10.1029/2005JD006290.
Allen, M. R., and S. F. B. Tett .1999. Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting. Climate Dynamics, 15:419–434, DOI: 10.1007/s003820050291•
Allen, M. R., and W. J. Ingram.2002. Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature, 419: 224–232, DOI: 10.1038/nature01092.
Allen, M., P. Stott. 2003. Estimating signal amplitudes in optimal fingerprinting, Part I: Theory. Climate Dynamics, 21:477–491, DOI: 10.1007/ s00382-003-0313-9.
Bentsen, M., I. Bethke, J. B. Debernard, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevåg, Ø.Seland, , H. Drange, C. Roelandt, I. A. Seierstad, C. Hoose, and J. E. Kristjansson. 2013. The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M - Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate. Geosci. Model Dev., 6:687-720, DOI:10.5194/gmd-6-687.
Donat M. G., L. V. Alexander, H. Yang, I. Durre, R. Vose, R. J. H. Dunn, K. M. Willett, E. Aguilar, M. Brunet, J. Caesar, B. Hewitson, C. Jack, A. M. G. Klein Tank, A. C. Kruger, J. Marengo, T. C. Peterson, M. Renom, C. Oria Rojas, M. Rusticucci, J. Salinger, A. S. Elrayah, S. S. Sekele, A. K. Srivastava, B. Trewin, C. Villarroel, L. A. Vincent, P. Zhai, X. Zhang, S. Kitching.2013. Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: The HadEX2 dataset. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 2098–2118, DOI:10.1002/jgrd.50150.
Groisman, P. Y., R. W. Knight, D. R. Easterling, T. R. Karl, G. C. Hegerl, and V. N. Razuvaev .2005. Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record. Journal of Climate, 18, 1326–1350, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3339.1.
Hannart, A. , A. Ribes and P. Naveau.2014. Optimal fingerprinting under multiple sources of uncertainty . Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 1261–1268, DOI: 10.1002/2013GL058653.
Hasselmann , K. 1993. Optimal fingerprints for the detection of time dependent climate change. Journal of Climate,6,1957–1971,DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)0062.0.CO;2
Hasselmann, K.1979. On the signal-to-noise problem in atmospheric response studies. In: Shaw DB (ed) Meteorology over the tropical oceans. Royal Meteorological Society, 251–259.
Hasselmann, K. 1997. Multi-pattern fingerprint method for detection and attribution of climate change. Climate Dynamics, 13, 601-611, DOI: 10.1007/s003820050185.
Hegerl, G. C. , O. Hoegh-Guldberg, G. Casassa, M. P. Hoerling, R. S. Kovats, C. Parmesan, D. W. Pierce, P. A. Stott. 2010. Good practice guidance paper on detection and attribution related to anthropogenic climate change. In: Stocker, T. F., C. B. Field, D. Qin, V. Barros, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, P. M. Midgley, K. L. Ebi (eds) Meeting report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change expert meeting on detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change. IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, Bern.
Hegerl, G. C., and F. W. Zwiers .2011. Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 2, 570–591, DOI: 10.1002/wcc.121.
Hegerl, G. C., and G. R. North, 1997. Comparison of statistically optimal approaches to detecting anthropogenic climate change. Journal of Climate, 10, 1125-1133, DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)0102.0.CO;2.
Hegerl, G. C., F. W. Zwiers, P. A. Stott and V. V. Kharin, 2004. Detectability of anthropogenic changes in annual temperature and precipitation extremes. Journal of Climate, 17, 3683–3700, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)0172.0.CO;2
Min, S. K., X. Zhang, and F. W. Zwiers .2008. Human-induced Arctic moistening, Science, 320, 518–520, DOI: 10.1126/science.1153468.
Min, S. K., X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers and G.C. Hegerl . 2011. Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature, 470,378-381, DOI:10.1038/nature09763.
Min, S. K., X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers, P. Friederichs and A. Hense . 2009. Signal detectability in extreme precipitation changes assessed from twentieth century climate simulations. Climate Dynamics, 32, 95–111, DOI: 10.1007/s00382-008-0376-8.
Polson, D., G. Hegerl, X. Zhang, and T. Osborn .2013. Causes of robust seasonal land precipitation changes. Journal of Climate, 26, 6679–6697, DOI:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00474.1.
Ribes, A., J. M. Azaı¨s, and S. Planton.2009. Adaptation of the optimal fingerprint method for climate change detection using a well-conditioned covariance matrix estimate. Climate Dynamics, 33,707–722 ,DOI:10.1007/s00382-009-0561-4.
Ribes, A.,F. W. Zwiers, J. M. Azaïs, and P. Naveau .2016. A new statistical approach to climate change detection and attribution . Climate Dynamics,1-20,DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3079-6
Ribes, A.,and L. Terray. 2013. Application of regularised optimal fingerprinting to attribution. Part II: Application to global near-surface temperature. Climate Dynamics, 41,2837–2853, DOI:10.1007/s00382-013-1736-6.
Ribes, A., L. Terray,and S. Planton .2013.Application of regularized optimal fingerprinting to attribution. Part I: method, properties and idealised analysis. Climate Dynamics, 41, 2817–2836, DOI:10.1007/s00382-013-1735-7.
Santer, B. D., C. Mears , F. J. Wentz , K. E. Taylor ,P. J. Gleckler , T. M. L. Wigley ,T. P. Barnett , J. S. Boyle , W. Brüggemann , N. P. Gillett , S. A. Klein ,G. A. Meehl , T. Nozawa ,D. W. Pierce ,P. A. Stott , W. M. Washington , and M. F. Wehner .2007. Identification of human-induced changes in atmospheric moisture content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 248–15,253, DOI:10.1073/pnas.0702872104.
Stocker, T. F., D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P. M. Midgley (Eds.)2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wan, H.,X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers and S. K. Min, 2014. Attributing northern high-latitude precipitation change over the period 1966–2005 to human influence. Climate Dynamics, 47, 1713–1726, DOI: 10.1007/s00382-014-2423-y.
Westra, S., L. V. Alexander, and F. W. Zwiers .2013. Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. Journal of Climate, 26, 3904–3918, DOI:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00502.1.
Willett, K. M., N. P. Gillett, P. D. Jones, and P.W. Thorne .2007. Attribution of observed surface humidity changes to human influence. Nature, 449, 710–712, DOI:10.1038/nature06207.
Yatagai, A., K. Kamiguchi, O. Arakawa, A. Hamada, N. Yasutomi and A. Kitoh .2012. APHRODITE: Constructing a Long-term Daily Gridded Precipitation Dataset for Asia based on a Dense Network of Rain Gauges. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 93, 1401–1415,DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00122.1.
Zhang, X., H. Wan, F. W. Zwiers, G.C. Hegerl and S. K. Min. 2013. Attributing intensification of precipitation extremes to human influence. Geophysical Research Letters,40, 5252–5257, DOI:10.1002/grl.51010.
Zhang, X., F. W. Zwiers, G. C. Hegerl, F. H. Lambert, N. P. Gillett,S. Solomon, P. Stott, and T. Nozawa .2007. Detection of human influence on 20th century precipitation trends. Nature, 448, 461–465, DOI:10.1038/nature06025.